GUIDES · BETSLIP DOCTOR
What happens if linked accounts post opposite sides of the same game?
BSD’s capper-record rule says opposite sides count independently. Linked accounts do not get to net one pick away or choose a winner after the game. Each posted pick remains part of the record under its own result evidence; one side does not cancel the other.
For BSD readers asking how a capper record handles opposite sides of one game · Updated
Each opposite-side pick counts independently
The capper record rules say opposite sides count independently. If two linked accounts post picks on opposing sides, BSD does not combine them into one net position that makes the less favorable pick disappear.
The result cannot be chosen after the game
The same rule says linked accounts cannot pick a winner after the game. A capper cannot wait to see which side succeeded and then count only that side. The record keeps both posted picks and uses the applicable result evidence for each.
Read each pick as its own record entry
When reviewing a record, assess each posted pick separately rather than netting opposing picks together. This rule describes record accounting; it is not evidence about any particular person or linked account.
Hypothetical example: two sides stay separate
Imagine two fictional linked accounts post opposite sides of one game. If BSD’s result evidence later records one side as a win and the other as a loss, both entries remain in the record. The capper cannot erase or net away the losing side after seeing the outcome. No real account, capper, pick or game is represented.
Related questions
Can linked accounts net opposite picks into one result?
No. BSD’s rule says opposite sides count independently.
Can a capper choose which side counts after the game?
No. The rule does not allow linked accounts to pick a winner after the game.
Does the rule identify any particular linked accounts?
No. It describes how the record treats opposite-side picks; it does not make a claim about a specific person or account.