GUIDES · BETSLIP DOCTOR
Why can a daily History card have different coverage from a seven-day summary?
The daily card is calculated by filtering records from a bounded seven-day record read, while the seven-day total comes from a separate server-provided summary. The record read can stop after four newest pages of 50 and may be partial; the summary is not built from that same fetched page set. Their coverage can therefore differ without proving a defect. The daily figure is not promised to be exhaustive when its source read is partial.
For Bettors comparing a daily History card with the seven-day summary · Updated
The daily card is derived from fetched records
History reads records for a seven-day range, sorted newest first, with up to four pages of 50. It then calculates a daily figure by filtering those fetched records to the selected settlement day and timezone.
If more pages remain after the cap, the fetched record set is partial. A daily card based on that set can omit older records even though they fall inside the calendar week.
The week total comes from another source
The seven-day summary is requested separately from the record pages and is returned as a server-provided aggregate. It is not calculated by summing the daily card's bounded rows.
Because the two figures use separate reads and coverage rules, a daily amount and a weekly summary need not be derived from identical records. Do not automatically label a difference as a defect or assume the daily record read is exhaustive.
Check the window and coverage basis
Before comparing, confirm the daily card's date and timezone and identify whether the underlying record read is partial. The week summary answers for its server aggregate; the daily card reflects the records fetched for the bounded seven-day read.
If the available detail does not establish complete daily coverage, preserve that uncertainty rather than projecting the displayed sample to all records in the week.
A partial weekly record read
Hypothetically, a busy week has more records than four pages of 50. The server returns its seven-day aggregate separately, while History computes one daily card from the newest fetched records and their settlement days. If the record read is partial, the two figures can have different coverage.
Related questions
Does a different daily and weekly amount prove History is wrong?
Not by itself. The daily figure is derived from a bounded record read, while the weekly amount comes from a separate server summary.
Does the daily card always include every record from that day?
The source read is capped. If it is partial, the daily calculation cannot be described as exhaustive.