GUIDES · BETSLIP DOCTOR
How does a BSD Doctor conversation use the saved Grade attached to it?
When you open Doctor from a saved Grade, the conversation is tied to that report and its original ticket. Doctor uses the saved evidence to explain the result and answer your question. A reply does not automatically run another Grade or turn missing evidence into a verified fact. A Grade is a second opinion, not a pick.
For Bettors asking Doctor about an existing BSD Grade · Updated
Start with the report you want to discuss
In the iPhone app, open History and choose Saved Grades. Find the analysis you mean using its title, date and slip details. Open the report, then choose Ask Doctor. The saved-analysis list also offers Open Doctor for an entry with a report.
This matters when you have researched similar slips more than once. A familiar team or player name is not enough to identify the report. Check the saved selections and analysis date before asking why a particular finding appeared.
Use the chat's Grade link to check its context
A report-linked conversation can show a Grade link in its header. Open it to inspect the report attached to that chat. If you opened an ordinary conversation without a Grade, do not assume it contains your latest analysis just because you mention the same slip.
For the clearest handoff, return to the intended saved report and open Doctor there. BSD checks that the report and ticket belong together. An unavailable report should be treated as unavailable, rather than replaced in your explanation by another analysis that happens to look similar.
Ask a question the saved evidence can answer
Doctor can explain a supported finding, help you understand a limitation, or focus on a particular leg. Make the question specific enough to identify the part of the report you are reading. That gives you a more useful conversation than asking whether the whole slip is a lock.
- Ask which saved source supports the finding you are reviewing.
- Ask what the report establishes about one selection and what remains unknown.
- Ask whether two apparently different statements describe a conflict or different evidence.
- Keep the report open when checking a factual claim in the reply.
An explanation keeps the report's limits
The question can change which saved findings Doctor focuses on. It does not supply a new sports record, fill an unanswered research question, or silently change the saved Grade. If the report only supports part of the answer, the useful response is to explain that part and identify the gap.
The report is also a record of the research available for that analysis. A conversation about it is not proof that current lineups, news or sportsbook prices have been checked again. If you need a new analysis, treat that as a separate action and review the access or quote shown before starting it.
Illustrative example: ask about one unanswered question
Suppose a saved report leaves a participation question unanswered. Open that report's Doctor conversation and ask: What does this report establish about participation, and what could not be verified? The goal is an explanation of the saved evidence and its gap. The wording of your question does not establish that a player is available, and a confident reply should not be treated as a newly published lineup. This is a synthetic reading example, not a real slip or research result.
Related questions
Does opening a general Doctor chat attach my latest Grade?
Do not assume that it does. Open the intended saved report and use Ask Doctor or its Open Doctor action when you want that report as the conversation's context.
Does asking Doctor a question automatically regrade the slip?
No. The conversation explains supplied context. A new Grade is a separate action; a follow-up question does not automatically refresh the report's research.